ThomasJPitts.co.uk
All of my online things
RSS
  • My Blog
  • My Projects
  • Geocaching Statistics
  • Contact Me
  • Weight Tracker
  • Webcam
Enhanced by Zemanta
ThomasJPitts 1st November 2010
2010, Apostrophe, Arts, English language, Grammar, Lost or Missing, November, Parent, People, Style Guides, Writers Resources
Like 0 Liked Liked
Gibberish, Language, Linkage

Atrocious Apostrophe’s

(The rogue apostrophe in the title is ironic… honest.)

I am a hater of the apostrophe – but only its misuse.

The apostrophe is used to denote missing letters in words that over the years have been dropped to ease pronunciation. The commonest examples are the auxiliary verbs and the word ‘not’. Thus I am becomes I’m and are not becomes aren’t. Of course there are exceptions, notably am not changing to ain’t in what is a stupendous piece of illogicality.

Some nouns can be shortened in the same way: a ship’s forecastle proved to be too hard to say, so the second syllable was dropped and it became fo’c’slebecause lazy sailors preferred it that way. Similarly, five of the clock became five o’clock. Some words gain apostrophes only in lyrical works, to help illustrate the rhythm – an example of this is ev’ry.

There are issues with the apostrophe. It is misunderstood by the vast majority of people. And yet the reason it exists is to make life easier. I would expect that if you didn’t know how to use something – a nuclear reactor, for instance – you wouldn’t even attempt to start. It’s the same with the apostrophe. If you don’t get it, leave it alone.

Anyway, there is only one rule to remember with the apostrophe, and that is, “Use an apostrophe when letters are missing.”

Now, there will be people who disagree with this, but it’s true.

Misuse often occurs where plurals are involved. Plural simply means more than one. So we see the famous greengrocer signs like Carrot’s cheap today. But there is nothing missing here, it just means more than one carrot, so it should read Carrots cheap today.

Another example: Parent’s are asked to supervise their children. Again nothing is missing, it is a request to more than one parent to look after their kids. The correct form is Parents are asked to supervise their children. But the children belong to the parents, you say. True no doubt, but the two words are not together in the sentence and the message is directed at parents, not children.

For more on this one rule, and how it applies to all uses of apostrophes, see The Dreaded Apostrophe, from which the above quote comes.

The photo above was taken at Leeds City Station, showing a corrected sign.

More vandals are needed in all of these places.

Go forth and correct.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

Ayrton Senna in a Honda NSX around Suzuka Parallel axes of reflection
offer
366?, Gibberish, Humour

280: What is the most pointless offer you’ve ever seen?

366?, Gibberish, Personal

262: When was the last time you wrote in any kind of long form?

366?, Blogging, Gibberish, Personal

254: What do you do when your partner’s not well?

Back to top
© ThomasJPitts.co.uk 2026
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

ThomasJPitts.co.uk
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.